Archive for Special Features

Department of overreaction

Randy Kuhl, as quoted in today’s Messenger-Post:

“My opponent (Massa) is saying, ‘save the oil for our children,’” Kuhl said. “There won’t be any children, there won’t be any United States if we don’t figure out our energy problems real quick.”

What? He really thinks we’re on the verge of extinction as a nation?

Rotten has more about the back-and-forth over energy.

Regardless of whether one favors drilling in ANWR or not, Kuhl’s pattern of absurd statements on the subject of energy does little for the Congressman’s credibility.

Comments (12)

The gas prices debate would be a joke if it weren’t so sad

The days of cheap gasoline are gone and they are never coming back.

There. I said it. I wasn’t the first and I won’t be the last.

The truth is that oil is a finite resource. In the past century, humans have already used up a majority of the world’s oil and it is never coming back. Indeed, America has only about 2-3% of the world’s oil reserves and we consume a quarter of all the oil on the planet. Yet, many if not most Americans have swallowed whole the fantasy that we have our very own Saudi Arabian desert off the coast of Florida or in the northern slopes of Alaska that is just waiting to be tapped. It’s a lie.

But our leaders from both parties- especially the Republicans- seem to be under the illusion that they can do something about the price of gas. They can’t. Nobody can. The implication is that if we only drill more, we will have $2 gasoline by next Thursday. It won’t happen. The earliest any new oil drilling could take place is about ten years from now, and by then, the market will have adjusted the price and we would save absolutely nothing when it comes to gas prices. But rest assured, we will have added considerably to the environmental woes which we are already inflicting on the only planet we have for future generations.

This oil-drilling fairy tale was epitomized last month in a taxpayer funded mailer sent out by Randy Kuhl in which he offered his plan for lower gas prices. But once you add up all of the maximum “savings,” the price of a gallon of gas comes out to about negative $1.10. In the words of a famous New Zealand politician, this is all a bunch of “puffery and bovine scatology.”

We need both of our presidential candidates to actually address the reality of the gas prices debate. We need them to say what they know but won’t admit to the American public: $4/gallon gasoline is just the beginning. Things are only going to get tougher from here on out. That should be the context of the debate, rather than what we think we can do to make this crap called oil any cheaper.

Our oilman of a president told us years ago what has become painfully obvious: “America is addicted to oil.” And you know something has gone terribly wrong when the pusher is telling the addict that they’re taking too much.

We, as Americans and indeed as human beings, need to confront this reality head-on. We don’t need more temporary or non-solution solutions.

What we need- and have needed for decades- is an Apollo project to get America off of oil. Hell, if the Brazilians could do it, why can’t the most powerful and prestigious nation in the world do it too? We need to drastically increase fuel efficiency and eventually phaseout all of the gas consuming vehicles in the next few decades. And while we’re doing that, let’s invest billions of dollars in renewable energy sources like solar, wind, and efficient and environmentally-friendly biofuels. It will have to happen: the oil is running out. The question isn’t if, but when.

As I said in the title, this debate would be funny if it weren’t so pitiful. I am sick of it, and I don’t think I’m the only one. Let’s demand that the media and our political leaders actually focus on real longterm solutions, not just more of the same short term ideas like more drilling, which will hurt this nation in the long run.

Comments

There is no new reasonable drilling!!

Off-shore drilling and ANWR drilling have become the darlings of the Republican candidate’s energy/economic platforms and now, some of the Democrats are buying into it. This is, somehow, going to solve our energy woes and decrease prices at the pump because everyone knows that, if it’s produced locally (North America) we pay less for it because it doesn’t have to be shipped across the seas. But, hold on here a minute…..

United Refinery, Warren, PA
United Refinery, Warren, PA

Meet United Refinery, Warren, Pennsylvania. Two hours away from us, you can buy their product at Kwick Fill (I’ve always hated that cute “K” usage - Kwick Fill, Kozey Kitchen, Kitty Kat) but do you see a lower price r/t shipping cost (their crude oil comes from Canada), or local production? I don’t pretend to understand the economics involved here, but some of this seems like common sense-lower shipping costs= lower pump prices-why is there no cause and effect here? And, big surprise, their net income has increased by 16 million from the prior year.

Oil Gains Weight, Concerns Mount - Refiners are having difficulties: they need to increase output, but the way to do that is often by acquiring heavier crude oil, which requires more energy to refine and can lead to more pollution. The EPA and numerous environmental groups are concerned about the trend toward heavier crude, which refiners insist must be a part of the solution to meet expected demand increases for gasoline and other refined products.

From this excerpt, it would appear that we already have the capacity to acquire more local crude, therefore, new drilling in uncharted waters does not seem to make sense either. So, offshore and ANWR drilling are just more talking points for those candidates appealing to the uneducated masses.

And if we did increase drilling, is anyone so ignorant as to believe that the cost for this drilling would not be passed onto the consumer in higher petroleum prices and tax subsidies for big oil?

This isn’t about the need for new oil sources-this is about greed.

Comments

BREAKING: Social Security Numbers Sitting Unsecured on County Clerk’s Site

Yikes! Anyone, who, like me, has done business with the county (like bought a house or registered a business for example), should be really nervous right about now:

Hundreds of social security numbers found on County Clerk’s website

Hundreds of social security numbers were found on the County Clerk’s website there for anyone to see.

News 10NBC found the social security numbers on documents filed in the Clerk’s office from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court. It appears as if the problem exists in the years 2000 through 2003.

This is huge, and bad. Talk about risk of identity theft. Oh, and this would be funny if it weren’t so serious:

The clerk, Cheryl Dinolfo, has taken steps to remove the social security numbers, but the state kept her hands tied for years.

So in other words, she can be all big and brave and stand up to the state while she’s grandstanding against Spitzer’s licensing plan (which was DOA anyway), but when it comes to securing our social security numbers? In that case, the state has “kept her hands tied”.

It seems to me like Dinolfo’s more focused in protecting her political career than us Monroe Countians.

UPDATE: Dinolfo has still not taken the site down. Height of irresponsibility. Oh, and there’s no state requirement to post this data online, anyway. Wayne County, for example, doesn’t post this information. So she’s either ill-informed on the laws, or she’s lying.

UPDATE 2: Tom Hasman, Dem challenger for the Clerk’s office (and information security expert, incidentally), has publicly asked Dinolfo to take the data down:

Hasman is expected to call on his oppononent, Republican incumbent Cheryl Dinolfo, to remove the public documents from the Web site.

I don’t know why it takes someone else to explain to her that that should’ve been the very first thing she should’ve done. Although, taking it down would be an admission of her guilt in this, so given the reluctance of GOP leadership to admit mistakes, from Bush on down, she might just be showing her true colors.

Comments (2)

Powers on Buffalo radio today next Tuesday

I’m not not sure how many of our readers can get radio stations from Buffalo, but since I can generally get Buffalo AM stations when I’m in western Monroe County, I’m guessing some can, so I’m passing on this info (from TAP):

Just saw that Jon Powers will be taking questions on Scott Leffler’s radio show on WLVL from 11:15-11:45 today next Tuesday.This one should be interesting…

Here’s the text of the announcement:

Tuesday, August 12, 2008
Just booked: Jon Powers
NY-26 Congressional Candidate Jon Powers will be in studio at WLVL on Tuesday from 11:15 until 11:45 a.m., taking questions from yours truly … and calls from listeners.

Comments

Freedom’s Watch up with ads in NY-29

Freedom’s Watch, a pro-war Republican 527 501(c)(4) group co-founded by George W. Bush press secretary Ari Fleischer, is up on the air with ads in NY-29 and elsewhere (via the Politicker):

Freedom’s Watch, the conservative advocacy organization heavily funded by Las Vegas billionaire Sheldon Adelson, is hitting the airwaves with a television and radio ad buy targeting Democratic House candidates across the country.

It is Freedom Watch’s single largest advertising purchase since the organization aired ads earlier this year in a Mississippi special election, according to a source familiar with the buy. The size of the buy is in the mid-six figures.

[....]

Radio ads, meanwhile are targeting 7th Congressional District candidate Mark Schauer, Ohio 15th Congressional District candidate Mary Jo Kilroy, Idaho 1st Congressional District Candidate Walt Minnick, Missouri 6th Congressional District candidate Kay Barnes, New York 29th Congressional District candidate Eric Massa, New Mexico 1st Congressional District candidate Martin Heinrich, Ohio 16th Congressional District candidate John Boccieri, U.S. Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.), U.S. Rep. Chris Carney (D-Penn.) and U.S. Rep. Don Cazayoux (D-La.).”

“Mid six figures” ain’t a lot of scratch when it’s divided ten ways. But this bears watching.

Comments (6)

John Parrinello-are you kidding us???

The Democrat & Chronicle has reported in its Sunday edition that the Board of Trustees has paid for John Parrinello to go see the MCC Women’s Basketball Championship for several years.

Quoting the article, it says that “MCC footed much of the bill for Parrinello’s trips, for a total of more than $9,000.” It goes further to quote MCC Spokesperson Cynthia Cooper as saying that “Parrinello was a logical choice to represent the college, not because his son is the coach but because Parrinello is a loyal follower of the team” and that “He’s an avid fan of the team.”

Are you kidding me?

For a man who admits he charges “300 bucks an hour to represent people” he can certainly cover his own cost for a basketball game!

I wonder–could that $9000 have better gone to a needy student whose parents will have to put a 2nd mortgage on their home to send their child to college? Or maybe split it up into 2 $4500 grants to benefit 2 potential students?

Our good friend County Legislator Harry Bronson (D) was quoted as saying, “It’s a stretch to say that’s necessarily in the interest of the college instead of the interest of the individual,”

Where do we draw the line? The article states Parrinello hasn’t submitted his costs for this year. I encourage the MCC Board of Trustees—if it has any sense of dedication to the students, to cancel Parrinello’s free tickets and travel.

This is a disgusting example of the lack of the Republican legislators and Republican-controlled MCC Board of Trustees to control their own.

Comments (3)

County Daycare Cuts — Where’s The Accountability?

Ever notice how, with the Brooks administration, everything’s someone else’s fault? “Unfunded” mandates? The state’s fault. Funded mandates? The state’s fault:

Some working families will likely lose their subsidized daycare under cost-cutting measures just announced by Monroe County Executive Maggie Brooks.

Brooks says the changes have to be made to offset state funding cuts. She’s making them just days after Governor Paterson said he’ll have to cut the state budget to close a six-point-four billion dollar deficit.

The county uses state funding to subsidize daycare for working low-income families who earn up to 165 percent of the poverty level. Now the county will cut that eligibility back to 125 percent of poverty.

Even big, bad former County Exec Jack Doyle didn’t push poor people under the bus so hard, according to the County Leg Dem Caucus (no link yet):

The change will have the effect of pushing many Monroe County families further into poverty by eliminating their ability to provide safe, quality child care so they can earn a living wage and raise their family. This change is the most severe in recent memory, even steeper than former County Executive Jack Doyle’s cut down to 140% in 2002.

No wonder the Brooks administration tried to hide this in a “Friday news dump”. And that’s why we’re freshening it up bright and early Monday Morning. When people play politics on this kind of stuff, these at-risk kids are the first to get pushed out of the boat, with no consideration for long-term consequences:

Legislator Carrie Andrews (D-Rochester) said, “Today’s announcement is a slap in the face to the hard working families in our county that struggle to put food on the table while keeping their children safe. I strongly implore the Executive to reconsider this decision due to the long-term social and fiscal consequences it will reap to taxpayers. Numerous studies have proven the long-term cost reductions to criminal justice, education and health care expenditures when parents have access to safe, affordable child care. Simply put, this is the wrong direction for our county.”

As RocBlogger said last week on a different topic: “Maggie Brooks: It’s all about the kids…NOT!

Comments (1)

Powers slams Davis for bribery

You may recall the story the Buffalo News broke a few weeks ago on Jack Davis’s attempts to buy his way onto the Independence Party line. The Jon Powers campaign has a video up slamming Davis for this and the Buffalo News has picked up on this as well:

“Consulting” fees paid to the wives of the most influential Independence Party leaders in Western New York are becoming an issue in the primary contest for the Democratic nomination to succeed Rep. Thomas M. Reynolds, R-Clarence.

Jonathan P. Powers, one of three candidates seeking the party’s nod, released a new online video Friday questioning the contention by Jack Davis, one of his opponents, that he is not “trying to buy a congressional seat.” After showing the wealthy industrialist making that denial during his candidacy announcement April 15, an announcer asks, “Really?”

“The party leader who uncovered the scandal said: ‘It’s all about what we call the bribe money from Jack Davis,’ ” the video says. “Davis’ reaction? His campaign manager said they were payments and that they would continue.”

John Gerken, Powers’ campaign manager, also asked how Davis could claim he is not buying the election when he is “paying off officials.”

“This district has had enough of the corruption that is polluting Washington,

Update: Here’s the Powers video I referred to.

Comments (3)

Monroe County Pensions & Paychecks & “Pockets of Fat”

From WHAM13, on pension double-dipping:

Another example is Robert Wiesner, the husband of Monroe County Executive Maggie Brooks. Wiesner’s pension from his job at the Rochester Police Department is $61,673.14. He earns more than $91,000 as head of security at the Monroe County Water Authority.

“It’s actually a better value for taxpayers because they’re getting an employee who has many years of service who has retired from one level of government and is now bringing that expertise to another part of government for a much lower cost,” said Brooks, referring to the fact that Wiesner cannot add to the pension he is currently receiving.

Whoa, is the spin making you dizzy, too? So what is the total we as a county are paying the Brooks-Wiesners? She makes $120,000, and the county pays him $91,000. Total - $211,000 plus benefits if my math’s right. And that’s not including Weisner’s pension.

From a 2003 City Newspaper article:

During her campaign, County Executive-elect Maggie Brooks said she can balance the budget by outsourcing, combining services, and reviewing the budget thoroughly for pockets of fat. Brooks’ Democratic rival, Mayor Bill Johnson, said the possibility of a property tax increase had to be kept on the table.

I’m thinking there’s one big pocket of fat right in the Brooks-Wiesner household that could be cut right off the bat.  How much other double-dipping is happening at the county?

Comments (7)

Video interview with Jon Powers

The Albany Project has a good video interview with Jon Powers.

Comments (1)

TAP slams Davis for anti-Powers website

From The Albany Project:

When two time loser Jack Davis began making noise about a third run at the NY-26 seat, he made all sorts of promises to the local Democrats he was trying to woo. He told them that this time he really meant it. This time he was not only going to commit a substantial sum of his personal financial resources, but this time he was actually going to, ya know, get out and actually campaign. This was, of course, yet more BS. So far we have seen not much more than tons of truly awful direct mail, his ridiculous “gasroots” stunt where he literally bought gas for folks, his rich guy condescension towards his opponents and a truly awful faux country jingle that simply defies description though does lend itself to vicious mockery.

Now crazy Jack is at it again, throwing money at his race, only this time he’s crossed a line, a legal as well moral one, and one would hope he gets smacked for it. Instead of actually dragging himself out from his well appointed cave to actually engage voters, he’s bought himself a site that “spoofs” that of his primary opponent, a man who actually has been out in the district engaging voters and building a real people powered campaign, Jon Powers.

Comments (2)

New local Rothenberg House race ratings

The Rothenberg Political Report is out with its latest race ratings for the US House of Representatives.

The run through of the competitive races in New York:

  • 13th District (Staten Island): Moved from “Toss-up/Tilt Democratic” to “Democrat Favored”
  • 20th District (around Saratoga Springs): Moved from “Lean Democratic” to “Democrat Favored”
  • 25th District (eastern Monroe County): Moved from “Lean Democratic” to “Democrat Favored”
  • 26th District (western Monroe County): Moved from “Pure Toss-up” to “Toss-up/Tilt Republican”
  • 29th District (southern Monroe County): Stayed at “Toss-up/Tilt Republican”

The color lettering denotes which party currently controls which seats. All of the other congressional districts in New York are considered safe. Three of the competitive races moved towards the Democrats, one moved towards the Republicans, and one remained unchanged. There were no reasons given for the specific changes.

Comments (1)

30-0: Bill Press says Progressive radio silenced on public airwaves

Bill Press was the keynote speaker at a Greece Democrats fundraiser last night here in upstate New York and Rochesterturning was there, represented by Stlo7, ladkiddo and yours truly. Here are some of my notes, more later:

Press said he and his colleagues went over the figures and the Rochester area now will have 30 hours of conservative radio and 0 (ZERO) hours of progressive radio when WROC switches to a sports format soon. He said it is “no coincidence because they don’t want the truth to be told between now and November.” Press said that nationally there is 9 hours of right wing talk for 1 hour of progressive talk. 30-0, well, it’s hard to have a more warped score.

Clearly, progressives are losing the radio war and Press encourages us all to “Raise hell.” He went on to say “If they’re gettiing licenses that we own then we should get a fair share. Louise Slaughter is leading the effort to bring back fairness. Public air waves are supposed to serve the public, the general interest, not just the conservative audience.”

Comments (6)

NY-26: Jon Powers earns support of Rochester Building Trades Council

Image Courtesy Michael Parks
Image Courtesy Michael Parks
The Rochester Building Trades Council today endorsed Jon Powers, the endorsed Democratic candidate for Congress in NY-26.  That comes to thirty labor endorsements, which indicates the growing power of the Powers campaign. Frank Wirt, President of The Rochester Building and Trades Council, which represents over 16,000 working men and women in and around Monroe County, said:

“We need someone that isn’t a career politician in Congress that can help bring the change we need to put our country back on track. Jon is trying to change the direction of this country to help the working people of Western New York. He makes us proud to be Americans.”

Powers understands the concerns of voters represented by labor unions because he is out amongst the people every day, knocking on doors and listening to the voters’ concerns.  Powers is doing the hard work for the 26th district already.  Fancy mailers and tv and radio ads can’t replace boots on the ground and actual volunteers.  It’s a matter of people power and Jon Powers has people power.

Comments (1)

« Previous entries

Election Day Countdown

All content on this site © 2007 RochesterTurning.com, All Rights Reserved.
Read about Joe Bruno's shady campaign cash.