On Being Very Good Republicans
Yesterday, on “Face the Nation”, Dede Scozzaffava played counter-point to Dick Armey, the man responsible for destroying her campaign for Congress in the special election for NY 23. The transcript from the show can be read here, Dede shows up about half-way down. The New York Observer, though, feels like a follow-through was lacking. I agree:
Scozzafava and Armey were invited for a segment pegged to last week’s news that the national G.O.P. may adopt a sort-of litmus test for future Republican candidates, requiring them to support eight of ten agenda items to receive official party backing.
They were the perfect guests for this topic, with the Armey-assisted destruction of Scozzafava’s campaign in the 23rd District serving as a preview of the implications of such a purity test.
An extended back-and-forth between them would have vividly illustrated the purity vs. pragmatism debate that is now gripping the G.O.P. - and that Armey’s side is clearly winning. It also would have been fun to watch. Too bad the format didn’t allow for any direct interaction between them.
Apparently, the GOP is having a discussion about adopting this litmus test in order to determine who receives endorsements and funding, in the future, from the Republican party. Scozzafava’s campaign was just the beginning. This idea of Republican/Conservative purity will certainly solidify those from the Christian right who hunger to follow blindly behind a candidate adhering to their twisted beliefs.
This sort of discussion would never happen in the Democratic Party. Democrats, for the most part are independent thinkers and rebel, accordingly, when being told what to think and do.
It is so much easier to be a good Republican, than it is to be a good Democrat-no thought required. Just blind allegiance.