Kuhl meets with D&C editorial board
From Tom Tobin on the editorial blog:
Congressman Randy Kuhl was in for a free-form discussion that was really about an incumbent trying to feel out an Editorial Board in advance of a reelection run, and when we got back to our desks word came down that Maggie Brooks wants Bill Reilich to take over the local party chair from Steve Minarik. Kuhl’s a companionable sort but he throws out a lot of non-answer answers. He sems intent on saying nothing that that has immediate news value, a good posture for politicians but less than scintillating for attending writers and editors.
I wonder if he joked about “packing” this time. With any luck we’ll see some kind of more formal assessment of the interview later in the week at the D&C.
Related posts:
I wonder if he remember to zip his fly this time. I heard that at the last interview he “forgot” and no one bothered to say anything - inside joke.
Tobin seems to think that the only problem with John R. Kuhl’s “non-answer answers” is that it is “less than scintillating for attending writers and editors”. I think there’s a bigger problem here … politicians who use “non-answer answers” clearly have something to hide, and their constituents deserve answers.
Go ahead, John R. Kuhl, take a stand on whatever issues they ask you about! I guess that’s too much to expect from JRK.
Adding, I don’t see Eric Massa failing to take a stand, or coming up with “non-answer answers”.
I agree with you.
[...] Randy Kuhl visits the D&C Editorial Board. No positive press there. [...]