<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today&#8217;s special election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139646</link>
		<dc:creator>rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 03:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139646</guid>
		<description>[...] Democrat Don Cazayoux won the special election in Louisiana&#8217;s sixth Congressional districtÃ‚Â  that we wrote about earlier today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Democrat Don Cazayoux won the special election in Louisiana&#8217;s sixth Congressional districtÃ‚Â  that we wrote about earlier today. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139529</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139529</guid>
		<description>I agree it's a decent metric, but an overly optimistic one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it&#8217;s a decent metric, but an overly optimistic one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rottenchester</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139518</link>
		<dc:creator>Rottenchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 11:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/todays-special-election/#comment-139518</guid>
		<description>Bush would lose badly against a Democrat.

That said, I still think the "districts that favored Bush in '04" metric is a decent one to single out conservative districts.  Bush was a mediocre president presiding over a war that wasn't going too well, running against an OK-but-not-great Kerry in 2004.   There was nothing in that election, except perhaps the war, to make people vote outside their natural comfort zones.

The difference this time is the war is very unpopular and that will swing some districts if the incumbent is seen as a war supporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush would lose badly against a Democrat.</p>
<p>That said, I still think the &#8220;districts that favored Bush in &#8216;04&#8243; metric is a decent one to single out conservative districts.  Bush was a mediocre president presiding over a war that wasn&#8217;t going too well, running against an OK-but-not-great Kerry in 2004.   There was nothing in that election, except perhaps the war, to make people vote outside their natural comfort zones.</p>
<p>The difference this time is the war is very unpopular and that will swing some districts if the incumbent is seen as a war supporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.437 seconds -->
