Comments on: Democrat wins special election in LA-06 http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/ turning the tide upstate Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:48:27 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: ladkiddo http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139852 ladkiddo Mon, 05 May 2008 12:31:29 +0000 http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139852 This is not progress. This is a sad commentary on Lousiana and what you have to do to get elected as a Democrat. This is not progress. This is a sad commentary on Lousiana and what you have to do to get elected as a Democrat.

]]> By: rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139847 rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate Mon, 05 May 2008 11:23:46 +0000 http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139847 [...] As we told you earlier, Democrats won a special election in a heavily Republican district in Louisiana over the weekend. We’ve offered own thoughts on the impact this may have in NY-25 (I tend to believe it may mean that Republicans essentially give up on NY-25), now Rottenchester has some musings about what it means for NY-29: … if I were the Kuhl campaign, I’d be wondering about running the NRCC playbook this fall. Saying a Democrat will raise taxes, that he’ll allow a horde of immigrants to cross the border, and trying to link him to supposedly toxic figures like Pelosi and Obama didn’t work in two recent elections. And Republican voters are electing Democrats who say they’ll end the war in Iraq and do something about healthcare. When you’re on the wrong side of too many issues, the usual distractions won’t work. Perhaps its time for Republicans to start talking about their positive agenda, if they have one. [...] [...] As we told you earlier, Democrats won a special election in a heavily Republican district in Louisiana over the weekend. We’ve offered own thoughts on the impact this may have in NY-25 (I tend to believe it may mean that Republicans essentially give up on NY-25), now Rottenchester has some musings about what it means for NY-29: … if I were the Kuhl campaign, I’d be wondering about running the NRCC playbook this fall. Saying a Democrat will raise taxes, that he’ll allow a horde of immigrants to cross the border, and trying to link him to supposedly toxic figures like Pelosi and Obama didn’t work in two recent elections. And Republican voters are electing Democrats who say they’ll end the war in Iraq and do something about healthcare. When you’re on the wrong side of too many issues, the usual distractions won’t work. Perhaps its time for Republicans to start talking about their positive agenda, if they have one. [...]

]]> By: Lee http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139836 Lee Mon, 05 May 2008 09:37:54 +0000 http://rochesterturning.com/2008/05/03/democrat-wins-special-election-in-la-06/#comment-139836 By the way, he was a pro-life Democrat, promoted by Democrats for Life. Progress. By the way, he was a pro-life Democrat, promoted by Democrats for Life.

Progress.

]]>