<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Richardson dropping out</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrea</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101861</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 18:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101861</guid>
		<description>Like the others, I'm predicting the VP nod is likely.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like the others, I&#8217;m predicting the VP nod is likely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101852</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101852</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, although I am not a big Biden fan.  

I was disappointed in Richardson's campaign but he has proved himself very capable at actually governing.  So he might make a very good VP.  

And his presence on the ticket would help a lot in the southwest.  It might put Arizona in play and effectively lock up NM (it would almost certainly do this) and Nevada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, although I am not a big Biden fan.  </p>
<p>I was disappointed in Richardson&#8217;s campaign but he has proved himself very capable at actually governing.  So he might make a very good VP.  </p>
<p>And his presence on the ticket would help a lot in the southwest.  It might put Arizona in play and effectively lock up NM (it would almost certainly do this) and Nevada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: +++</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101848</link>
		<dc:creator>+++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 17:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101848</guid>
		<description>The world is Richardson's oyster at this point.  He is qualified to hold most any government post, has better than average national support, and most importantly, he hasn't pissed anybody off .  Domienici's seat is his for the asking, VP to Clinton or Edwards is an obvious choice, but what would be the best option is to make him the secretary of state and send him around the world to apologies for the country's rude behavior over the past decade.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world is Richardson&#8217;s oyster at this point.  He is qualified to hold most any government post, has better than average national support, and most importantly, he hasn&#8217;t pissed anybody off .  Domienici&#8217;s seat is his for the asking, VP to Clinton or Edwards is an obvious choice, but what would be the best option is to make him the secretary of state and send him around the world to apologies for the country&#8217;s rude behavior over the past decade.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rottenchester</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101842</link>
		<dc:creator>Rottenchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101842</guid>
		<description>I'm glad that I won't have to hear him repeat his resume over and over in the next debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad that I won&#8217;t have to hear him repeat his resume over and over in the next debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrviper</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrviper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101823</guid>
		<description>There's been a lot of talk about Richardson running for the open senate seat in New Mexico. It recently opened up when Pete Domenici (R) announced his retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about Richardson running for the open senate seat in New Mexico. It recently opened up when Pete Domenici (R) announced his retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BDP</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101821</link>
		<dc:creator>BDP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101821</guid>
		<description>Richardson would be an ideal VP candidate for Hillary or Edwards.  Not so much so for Obama.  If Obama wins the nomination, I think the ideal VP candidate for him would be Biden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richardson would be an ideal VP candidate for Hillary or Edwards.  Not so much so for Obama.  If Obama wins the nomination, I think the ideal VP candidate for him would be Biden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis o'brien</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101814</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis o'brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101814</guid>
		<description>i understand the thinking on the fly, i was curious because i don't really know him past his resume. i didn't even know he was term limited, for example.
i think nixon was the last to ride off into the sunset and that was not exactly voluntary, so now i can see the richardson angle. how about being ambassador to some tropic island nation? that is kind of riding off into the sunset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i understand the thinking on the fly, i was curious because i don&#8217;t really know him past his resume. i didn&#8217;t even know he was term limited, for example.<br />
i think nixon was the last to ride off into the sunset and that was not exactly voluntary, so now i can see the richardson angle. how about being ambassador to some tropic island nation? that is kind of riding off into the sunset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlo7</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101810</link>
		<dc:creator>stlo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101810</guid>
		<description>Richardson is out of a job in 2010 (term limits) so unless he goes back to the ranch (when was the last time someone in the public eye rode off into the sunset) he will be looking for something to do.  

Maybe VP slot, maybe something else - there is too much uncertainty for him to endorse right now.

Again all my comments were/are off the cuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richardson is out of a job in 2010 (term limits) so unless he goes back to the ranch (when was the last time someone in the public eye rode off into the sunset) he will be looking for something to do.  </p>
<p>Maybe VP slot, maybe something else - there is too much uncertainty for him to endorse right now.</p>
<p>Again all my comments were/are off the cuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis o'brien</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101805</link>
		<dc:creator>dennis o'brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2008/01/10/richardson-dropping-out/#comment-101805</guid>
		<description>what is this, the 90's? seriously though, why would richardson want a cabinet job? hasn't he been there done that? and feel free to treat this as a stupid question, because in all honesty, i am not up on richardson enough and i could be missing something obvious here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is this, the 90&#8217;s? seriously though, why would richardson want a cabinet job? hasn&#8217;t he been there done that? and feel free to treat this as a stupid question, because in all honesty, i am not up on richardson enough and i could be missing something obvious here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.478 seconds -->
