The flyer next time

The elections in 2008 will be all immigrant-bashing all the time. The strategy is already paying dividends for Republicans:

It’s hard to imagine a more miserable political climate for Republicans — hurting nationally because of the unpopularity of President Bush and the Iraq war, and even more in Ohio because of the economy and local factors that have knocked the GOP off its game over the past two years.

But Latta, running in a special election for a suburban Toledo-based House district, crafted a message — echoed by party officials — that bashed illegal immigrants who live here, drive here or get government-funded health care.

He won by 14 points. Democrats and Republicans alike credit the immigration message for the big margin.

You can bet Randy Kuhl, Tom Reynolds, and Jim Walsh were watching. And you can bet that they will pull out every nasty, racist, xenophobic trick in the Republican playbook next fall.

Here’ s something interesting, though: the Republicans need to avoid immigrant-bashing in the presidential election in order to be competitive in Arizona and New Mexico. Here’s E. J. Dionne (whom I usually despise but he’s right this time):

This contest (the Ohio election mentioned above) points to an important but little-noticed disconnect between how immigration is likely to play in the 2008 congressional elections and how it will affect the presidential campaign. A Latino backlash against the Republicans could hurt their nominee for president, even as a backlash against illegal immigration could help some Republicans running for Congress.

In the presidential election, Latino votes could well tip Western states that voted for President Bush in 2004 to the Democrats, who are enjoying a Latino surge. A study released last week by the Pew Hispanic Center found that in 2007, 57 percent of registered voters who are Hispanic identified themselves as Democrats, compared with 23 percent who are Republicans — a 34-point advantage. A year ago, the Democratic Latino advantage was just 21 points. Immigration has a lot to do with this. Hispanics gave Democrats a 41 percent to 14 percent edge on dealing with illegal immigration.

This shift will matter in New Mexico, where people of Hispanic origin account for 42.6 percent of the state’s population, and also in Arizona, (25.3 percent Hispanic); Nevada (19.7 percent) and Colorado (17.1 percent).

Yet the Hispanic population is quite small in the limited number of highly competitive districts that will determine control of the House.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

2 Comments »

Comment by Jiminy Bizbo
2007-12-13 13:42:58

That handout still bugs me. *If* Spitzer’s license proposal was going to give illegals all of these “COUNTY” benefits, perhaps they could inform us of what program they have put in place to prevent them from collecting our dear “COUNTY” benefits? After all, no one argued that the figure of “100’s of thousands” of illegals cited by Spitzer was wrong, so obviously Broomarik is handing them out…WHAT system have they concocted to prevent this?

And I think they should still be charged with hate crimes for that propoganda. Where are the Muslim/Islamic leaders on this issue?

 
2007-12-31 15:32:39

[...] articles on the subway. The recent article about the immigration issue in 2008 is fascinating. We’ve written before that we think that Republicans will make immigration the big issue in Congressional, if not the [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Election Day Countdown

All content on this site © 2006-2008 RochesterTurning.com, All Rights Reserved.
Read about Joe Bruno's shady campaign cash.