Randy explains, as only Randy can.

A review of one of Rubber-Stampin Randy’s Town Hall Meetings, from the Wellsville Daily Reporter, gave us this wonderful lead-in to justifying his Brazil trip: (emphasis mine)

ALLENTOWN — In a town where oil wells were once a familiar sight in front yards, Town of Allen residents complained to Congressman John R. “Randy” Kuhl, R-29th., during his recent round of town meetings, about high gas prices, heating costs and the need for alternative fuels.

(snip)

But that prompted Kuhl to say he will be traveling to South America next week, specifically to Brazil where the government mandates vehicles get 50 miles per gallon and where the energy industry has met the government’s demand for alternative fuels by using ethanol.

(snip)

Not going south of the border for the T-shirt, Kuhl added that he wants to learn how Brazil made its program work. “We need to develop the industry, I want to be fully informed.”

So, there you have it, folks. Randy will not come back with a T-shirt, but he will come back fully informed. I feel so much better just knowing that. Phew, now I know my tax dollars are being well spent. Thanks Randy.

VN:F [1.6.5_908]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Related posts:

  1. A smackdown sermon for Randy Kuhl, NY-29
  2. It is a tough election, so Randy Kuhl doesn’t want to talk to his constitutents
  3. Randy cares about Monroe County
  4. The Boys in Brazil - D&C to readers - back off Kuhl because Democrats went too
  5. Férias no Brasil. Muito quente!!

8 Responses to “Randy explains, as only Randy can.”

  1. stlo7 says:

    So Randy is off to Brazil. Congressional folks go on trips, fact finding trips all the time.

    Who is really paying for it and making all the arrangements? The Sugar cane lobby? Some other interest? or our tax dollars? That is the real question.

    The story here is you don’t need to go to Brazil to see that their government mandated fuel standards to 50 MPG. Where is Randy on fuel efficiency?

    Whether or not they use sugar can or corn - does it matter from viewing a manufacturing plant? There is a chemical process right? Loads of raw materials (cane or corn) are processed into ethanol. Sure one is more efficient from a fuel perspective (per other posts the commenters) but it is like taking a tour of a brewery - what do you really see? Railway cars full of hops, copper vats a huge refrigerated room, and a really cool bottling line.

    If you read the rest of the article ladkiddo links to check out this exchange -

    The conversation stemmed from a point made earlier in the discussion concerning the need to break the nation’s dependency on fossil fuels.

    Kuhl said the country’s auto makers have not been negligent. “There are a lot of proposals out there, but you get a lot of push back from the car manufacturers that they can’t make it and it’ll mean more job losses to overseas,” he said.

    But constituent Kath Buffington of Belmont pointed out, “There are many vehicles already getting high mileage, Toyota, Nissan an Honda. You look under the hood or any car and you’ll see that half the parts are made in Yugoslavia or someplace else.”

    “They just need to be pushed by the federal government to reach the 35 mph gallon mark and make more fuel efficient and lighter cars,” he said, “but Americans have a love affair with big, fast cars.”


    There is circular logic in that exchange.

    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. ladkiddo says:

    Since we’ve been talking about sugarcane ethanol, here’s a little info from Rolling Stone:

    Nor is all ethanol created equal. In Brazil, ethanol made from sugar cane has an energy balance of 8-to-1 — that is, when you add up the fossil fuels used to irrigate, fertilize, grow, transport and refine sugar cane into ethanol, the energy output is eight times higher than the energy inputs. That’s a better deal than gasoline, which has an energy balance of 5-to-1. In contrast, the energy balance of corn ethanol is only 1.3-to-1 - making it practically worthless as an energy source. “Corn ethanol is essentially a way of recycling natural gas,” says Robert Rapier, an oil-industry engineer who runs the R-Squared Energy Blog.

    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. Paige says:

    Thanks, Stlo7. I have been saying this as well. But unless Randy truly has a change of heart and agrees that alternative fuels and 50mpg is necessary, this trip is a waste of time. Everyone knows that our supply of fossil fuel is limited, and the demand globally is rising. And even if Randy truly changes his mind and moves in the direction of alternative energy, he needs to convince the other troglodytes in his party, all of whom we have to thank for our frightening dependence on foreign oil.

    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. Paige says:

    The other problem with producing corn ethanol to increase our fuel supply is that it would move large amounts of corn needed for our food supply into the energy supply, thus raising the price of food.

    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  5. ladkiddo says:

    And the cost of Jack Daniels

    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VN:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  6. zabriskie says:

    Did you guys see this article in the Washington Post about this trip? This is UN-FREAKING-BELIEVABLE!!! He’s taking river tours of the Amazon and staying in treetop hotels!!!

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/01/AR2007110102290.html

    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  7. DragonFlyEye says:

    Not even.

    Simply put: you cannot create enough Ethanol to power our needs as they sit right now, even if you turned over every, single, stinking square foot of land to the production of Ethanol. It cannot be done, even if you use the higher-output switchgrass or grain sorgum options.

    The only discussion that matters is not what we use for fuel, but how we efficiently use the fuel we have. If we didn’t use so much, gasoline would be fine and dandy, even with dwindling supplies.

    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    VA:F [1.6.5_908]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  8. [...] I thought we had a clear picture of what Randy’s jaunt to Brazil was all about, but now I’m not so sure. This article in [...]

Leave a Reply