Getting to Yes with the County Legislature GOPers
So, I mentioned a while back that I’m reading “Getting To Yes”, one of the seminal books on the art of negotiation of the late 20th century. Between work, kids, and local politics, I’m getting through it at an average of a page a day. I hope to finish before I retire.
As I read, I’m impressed by all the commonsense strategies for negotiating, like “take the person out of the position” (a nicer way of saying “hate the sin, not the sinner”), allow the other side to save face, etc.
And reading through the strategies and real-life examples they provide fires my imagination. I think about how I could apply them to my workplace, my home life, and even in certain political situations.
But when I think about applying these to the County Leg, I blank. I mean, what if I had the misfortune to be a Dem on the Leg, trying to negotiate with the GOP majority?
Taking the person out of the position is fine– I could feel frustration with the positions and policies they support without disliking them personally. But what about the fact that they kill virtually all Dem-initiated legislation in committee? And most anything that makes it to the floor of the leg gets “referred to administration” so Maggie & Minarik can sit on it until it rots? Or that even requests for a little extra time to review the budget plan get shot down summarily so the plan can be rammed through in 45 minutes?
We’re not dealing with rational actors here. This is party over people, party over the county’s best interests. The few times you see folks on the GOP side voting rationally, they get punished and whipped back into lockstep by the GOP leadership.
Similar to the US Congress the last 6 years, “bi-partisanship” means “Dems should go along with whatever the GOP majority wants”. Only now that the Dems are in the majority in Congress do you see significant breaks with the GOP leadership. It would be great to see some of the GOP legislators be able to spread their wings and vote their conscience again, without fear of the Minarik Machine.




Bythepeople, you make a very good point. I haven’t read that particular book, but I believe that all such similar books rely upon the (often-unstated) principle that both parties are acting in good faith and will react positively to logical arguments. When those conditions don’t hold, there’s no effective way to negotiate with people. And you wind up with no communication and no effective way to change things. This is clearly where Rethuglicans have gone. It is anti-people, it is anti-good government and it is anti-responsible.
Between work, kids, and local politics…
…You’re learning the REAL art of negotiation, not to mention time management through the efforts of your own life. Keep up the good work!
Heh! You know, when I learn enough to win an argument with my wife, then I’ll be ready to run for County Leg myself.
How To Win An Argument With Your Wife In 3 Easy Steps:
1. Admit she has a good point and say how she’s such a good listener.
2. Repeat back what she has to say to show understanding.
3. Tell her she’s so beautiful when she changes her mind (to your point of view).
[...] are you supposed to be “Getting To Yes” with people who act this [...]