<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brooks Afraid to Debate Stainton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Itchy</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54973</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 17:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54973</guid>
		<description>That does indeed seem to be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That does indeed seem to be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thejobofone</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54622</link>
		<dc:creator>thejobofone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54622</guid>
		<description>much ado about nothing......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>much ado about nothing&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: +++</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54098</link>
		<dc:creator>+++</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54098</guid>
		<description>Nojay has no credibility.  Finally a fiscal conservative runs for county Executive and he backs the candidate that spends money on big projects like Ren Square and then wants to raise sales taxes to pay for it.

My favorite part is when Minarik says ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œMaggieÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s always been available and accessible to the mediaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â as he fills in for her unavailable-for-comment self on the show.  Apparently she is not as available and accessible when it comes to talking about issues where she has stuck it to the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nojay has no credibility.  Finally a fiscal conservative runs for county Executive and he backs the candidate that spends money on big projects like Ren Square and then wants to raise sales taxes to pay for it.</p>
<p>My favorite part is when Minarik says ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…â€œMaggieÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s always been available and accessible to the mediaÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â as he fills in for her unavailable-for-comment self on the show.  Apparently she is not as available and accessible when it comes to talking about issues where she has stuck it to the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchy</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54096</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54096</guid>
		<description>Evan, I'm extremely pleased to hear that, thank you for commenting, and clearing things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan, I&#8217;m extremely pleased to hear that, thank you for commenting, and clearing things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54092</link>
		<dc:creator>rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54092</guid>
		<description>[...] &#171; Brooks Afraid to Debate Stainton [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &laquo; Brooks Afraid to Debate Stainton [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan Dawson, 13 WHAM</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54091</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Dawson, 13 WHAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54091</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the comments on the site, and I'd like to respond to a few points specifically.

1.  "This could have been an awesome debate, a real chance to see a clash of ideologies, and an excellent chance for the people to hear ideas from a candidate who supports alternatives to the drive-everywhere car culture. 13WHAM wasnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t about to let that happen, though."

We plan to focus on Mr. Stainton's platform in future broadcasts.  This morning, the purpose was to focus on whether he merits a debate.  We devoted more than six minutes to the discussion, which is a marathon in terms of news time.  

2.  "The video presented a well-lit Nojay in studio, wearing a jacket and tie, in a tight head and shoulders shot. Stainton is presented as an outsider, standing in the public market, without a tie, and with a run-down building in the background. The camera is much further away from Stainton, as though they donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t want to get too close to this dangerous manÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦"

Both were invited to come in to the studio.  Mr. Stainton declined, saying he could not take time away from collecting signatures at the public market.  He asked if he could appear via telephone, and I said an alternative was to send a live truck his way.  He chose the location, and I did not notice a run-down type of atmosphere in the background; we introduced him as being out at the public market, which I would assume was clear to the viewer.

When shooting a live shot of someone in the field, you need to stay wider for a variety of reasons.  I would have liked Mr. Stainton to join us in studio, but that was his choice.

Again, thanks for the feedback.  

Evan Dawson
13 WHAM News
CW-WHAM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the comments on the site, and I&#8217;d like to respond to a few points specifically.</p>
<p>1.  &#8220;This could have been an awesome debate, a real chance to see a clash of ideologies, and an excellent chance for the people to hear ideas from a candidate who supports alternatives to the drive-everywhere car culture. 13WHAM wasnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t about to let that happen, though.&#8221;</p>
<p>We plan to focus on Mr. Stainton&#8217;s platform in future broadcasts.  This morning, the purpose was to focus on whether he merits a debate.  We devoted more than six minutes to the discussion, which is a marathon in terms of news time.  </p>
<p>2.  &#8220;The video presented a well-lit Nojay in studio, wearing a jacket and tie, in a tight head and shoulders shot. Stainton is presented as an outsider, standing in the public market, without a tie, and with a run-down building in the background. The camera is much further away from Stainton, as though they donÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t want to get too close to this dangerous manÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã‚Â¦&#8221;</p>
<p>Both were invited to come in to the studio.  Mr. Stainton declined, saying he could not take time away from collecting signatures at the public market.  He asked if he could appear via telephone, and I said an alternative was to send a live truck his way.  He chose the location, and I did not notice a run-down type of atmosphere in the background; we introduced him as being out at the public market, which I would assume was clear to the viewer.</p>
<p>When shooting a live shot of someone in the field, you need to stay wider for a variety of reasons.  I would have liked Mr. Stainton to join us in studio, but that was his choice.</p>
<p>Again, thanks for the feedback.  </p>
<p>Evan Dawson<br />
13 WHAM News<br />
CW-WHAM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54090</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/brooks-afraid-to-debate-stainton/#comment-54090</guid>
		<description>I think a debate about whether to debate is valuable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a debate about whether to debate is valuable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
