<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another view of the WHAM 13 piece on Brooks and Stainton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 21:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jrviper</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54197</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrviper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 10:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54197</guid>
		<description>This comment seriously made me laugh out loud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This comment seriously made me laugh out loud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ladkiddo</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54158</link>
		<dc:creator>ladkiddo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 02:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54158</guid>
		<description>Did you notice that he said it was the "Democrat Party"?  He's such a stupid Republic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice that he said it was the &#8220;Democrat Party&#8221;?  He&#8217;s such a stupid Republic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: army42</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54120</link>
		<dc:creator>army42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54120</guid>
		<description>If he appeals to her ego then she might do it.  No politician wants to seem elitist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he appeals to her ego then she might do it.  No politician wants to seem elitist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchy</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54118</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54118</guid>
		<description>I actually agree that it was a pretty fair piece, now that some of my objections have been cleared up.  It's pretty common in politics to wrangle for a while before scheduling a debate.  I doubt Brooks will actually debate Stainton, she's got nothing to gain from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually agree that it was a pretty fair piece, now that some of my objections have been cleared up.  It&#8217;s pretty common in politics to wrangle for a while before scheduling a debate.  I doubt Brooks will actually debate Stainton, she&#8217;s got nothing to gain from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54113</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54113</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I&lt;/i&gt; think they should have a debate, but it isn't really WHAM's place to say.  All they can and should do is ask the two sides to discuss why they should or shouldn't have a debate...which is what they've done here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I</i> think they should have a debate, but it isn&#8217;t really WHAM&#8217;s place to say.  All they can and should do is ask the two sides to discuss why they should or shouldn&#8217;t have a debate&#8230;which is what they&#8217;ve done here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: army42</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54112</link>
		<dc:creator>army42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:05:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54112</guid>
		<description>A debate about whether to debate?  Can we have a meeting to decide if we need a meeting?  Since when does $250,000 make your ideas more valuable in terms of their intrinsic value?  I don't like where this is heading...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A debate about whether to debate?  Can we have a meeting to decide if we need a meeting?  Since when does $250,000 make your ideas more valuable in terms of their intrinsic value?  I don&#8217;t like where this is heading&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Itchy</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54095</link>
		<dc:creator>Itchy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54095</guid>
		<description>Try listening to his radio show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try listening to his radio show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sahar Massachi</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54094</link>
		<dc:creator>Sahar Massachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/08/14/another-view-of-the-wham-13-piece-on-brooks-and-stainton/#comment-54094</guid>
		<description>That doesn't address the fact that Nojay was so rude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That doesn&#8217;t address the fact that Nojay was so rude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
