A conversation about blogs and the media

I try to not be “meta” (i.e., not to blog about blogging), but I though I’d point you to a discussion of the internet’s effect on politics on the D&C website. In his typically Tobinesque way, Mr. Tobin criticizes blogs (such as ours) using the most vague, fact-free generalities imaginable:

But what we get on the Web to this point is the opposite: innumerable viewpoints largely scattered to the wind, demanding not change but adherence to political ideologies from tired “liberal” and “conservative” texts, nothing new but just the old said more frequently and at higher decibel.

I found this insulting and unfair so I chose to respond in kind by talking about “entrenched media types like you who just want to keep their heads down and cash a paycheck every two weeks.” Shrill, I know, but we are angry, incivil bloggers here, you know!

I also asked Philbrick of Mustard St. (a high-quality conservative/libertarian leaning political blog that I like to read) to comment,  in order to show Mr. Tobin that bloggers of all political stripes can respect each other when they do a good job. I point to Philbrick’s comments, not just because he had kind words for us, but also because I thought this was a pretty good summary of what blogging is all about:

They follow the news constantly. Therefore, they are able to fold the information from a single story into the larger context of what’s really going on in the local political scene.

I have no doubt that you folks at the paper are saying “So how is that any different from us?”

Sorry. But it is. You tell the news. But after the news is told, there’s a part of the conversation that needs to begin, “And therefore …” (For purpose of full disclosure, this was told to me by a relentless local Republican political hack.) But I think it’s true.

I hope that in the future we are able to work together with more conservative bloggers like Mustard St. on other issues where we agree — like New York state governmental reform, for example.

For those of you who think I’m too tough on Tom Tobin (okay, I have no evidence that anyone atually thinks this), I’m going to start a muli-part series comparing Mr. Tobin favorably with renowned opinion writer David Broder; the working title is “Separated at birth.” You won’t want to miss it.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by Jerri S. Kaiser
2007-05-06 17:47:45

Did you see Broder’s column in today’s (5/06) D&C on the war?

2007-05-06 18:55:16

Yes, and I agreed with it. For the most part, though, he’s been awful. It isn’t fair of me to compare the D&C opinion people to Broder, because the D&C opinion pieces are much better: generally responsible, even though I I think that have some of the same problems that Broder and others have (especially the tendency to blame both sides for everything that goes wrong).

There’s a very good Harpers’ piece on Broder here.

 
 
Comment by Mark J B
2007-05-06 18:04:19

Its interesting. I’ve worked professionally in the editorial field prior to blogs being as popular as they are today. I’ve also worked professionally in the political field, and yes with certain representatives that we all know from the Rochester area. I’ve also worked with bloggers and know bloggers from virtually everywhere and, in truth, find that field to not only be the most fascinating, but certainly one of the most demanding and containing some of the most intelligent capable people that I have ever met. The fact of the matter, which you point out, is that blogs are flippantly criticized simply for being blogs and not newspapers, tv, radio, etc.

 
2007-05-06 23:20:27

[...] WBP found this one via our Brothers-in-Arms Rochester Turning since no one here reads the D&C staff blogs. [...]

 
Comment by dj_paige
2007-05-07 10:42:34

Tobin is part of a much larger attempt to de-legitimize blogs, and therefore de-legitimize the public voicing an opinion in a way that many people will hear. Tobin will be much happier if people only get their opinions from newspapers, radio and television, and have no easy way to voice their opinions to the masses (except for an occasional letter-to-the-editor, which of course Tobin and his editorial board control).

Tobin and those involved in the much larger effort won’t tell you that their goal is control of the message. They will seize on other symptoms of the blogosphere, such as “wide variety of opinions”, “incivility”, “lack of journalistic standards”, and on and on. But if you look back over the years, there has been an effort to consolidate the media into a small number of voices (Fairness doctrine was repealed, media was deregulated, etc.) and to squelch opposing voices. This is the latest thrust in this effort to control the media.

 
2007-05-07 20:16:41

[...] spoke out against the D&C dislike for blogs in one of their recent ed board blog posts. The D&C [...]

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Election Day Countdown

All content on this site © 2006-2008 RochesterTurning.com, All Rights Reserved.
Read about Joe Bruno's shady campaign cash.