<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Because I am that kind of person</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-128802</link>
		<dc:creator>rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 20:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-128802</guid>
		<description>[...] He quotes Ghandi-nice touch! We learn that Randy is listening to the Ambassadors and then we learn, on closer inspection, that he&#8217;s a little confused (but he does get some of the vowels right). Maybe he should have [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He quotes Ghandi-nice touch! We learn that Randy is listening to the Ambassadors and then we learn, on closer inspection, that he&#8217;s a little confused (but he does get some of the vowels right). Maybe he should have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-30953</link>
		<dc:creator>rochesterturning.com: turning the tide upstate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 21:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-30953</guid>
		<description>[...] debates were Randy Kuhl (D-NY29) said he was listening to the region&#8217;s ambassadors. There was debate and more discussion on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] debates were Randy Kuhl (D-NY29) said he was listening to the region&#8217;s ambassadors. There was debate and more discussion on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-28253</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 11:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-28253</guid>
		<description>OK, Randy's being a typical cowardly politician and moving in the direction of sanity and popular opinion when the heat on. Still, it would be better if he were intransigent and out of touch (or at least appears that way) so that Massa can squash him in 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, Randy&#8217;s being a typical cowardly politician and moving in the direction of sanity and popular opinion when the heat on. Still, it would be better if he were intransigent and out of touch (or at least appears that way) so that Massa can squash him in 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlo7</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27879</link>
		<dc:creator>stlo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 13:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27879</guid>
		<description>The journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step.  So at least we are in the right direction.  So each step is progress.  Still a long ways to go.

I guess we will wait and see when he challenges the administration.  That is when the Deputy whip thing comes into play.  Voting for something that will likely fail in the  Senate and thus doesn't put GWB the head of the Party is a position they don't want to be in does not constitute risk. 

I'll be off line for a while.  I'll drop both of you a line when I resurface.  So let's pause the conversation for a while

I think the progress is due to Democratic control of the House and Senate.    I also believe he needs to be convinced that Iraq is a bigger mess the longer we stay - that is the true reality.  Everything else is pretense to an exit.

It took the deaths of 634 troops to move him from the lobster comment to what you guys have deemed progress.  How many more until we have real progress?

This reminds me of Algiers - the French come in, brutally crush insurgents and actually make some success in killing the insurgent leadership.  A few years later they are unceremoniously booted out of the country.  Why?  Because they really alienated the population.   

In Iraq, we are buring villages to save them.  We need to stop lighting fires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The journey of 1000 miles begins with a single step.  So at least we are in the right direction.  So each step is progress.  Still a long ways to go.</p>
<p>I guess we will wait and see when he challenges the administration.  That is when the Deputy whip thing comes into play.  Voting for something that will likely fail in the  Senate and thus doesn&#8217;t put GWB the head of the Party is a position they don&#8217;t want to be in does not constitute risk. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be off line for a while.  I&#8217;ll drop both of you a line when I resurface.  So let&#8217;s pause the conversation for a while</p>
<p>I think the progress is due to Democratic control of the House and Senate.    I also believe he needs to be convinced that Iraq is a bigger mess the longer we stay - that is the true reality.  Everything else is pretense to an exit.</p>
<p>It took the deaths of 634 troops to move him from the lobster comment to what you guys have deemed progress.  How many more until we have real progress?</p>
<p>This reminds me of Algiers - the French come in, brutally crush insurgents and actually make some success in killing the insurgent leadership.  A few years later they are unceremoniously booted out of the country.  Why?  Because they really alienated the population.   </p>
<p>In Iraq, we are buring villages to save them.  We need to stop lighting fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rottenchester</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rottenchester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 12:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27835</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Exile that there's a hint of progress here.   Last Fall, Kuhl was using anecdotes to support the notion that the war is going better than the media was reporting.  The "lobster" remark, and more importantly, the General Casey remark, both supported that position.  Now, Kuhl is using anecdotes to support a position that I think most people agree with:  Iraq will be a mess if we pull out.   So I think Kuhl's assessment of Iraq is at least current with reality, which is a change from 6 months ago.  His conclusion that we need to stay to fix things is what's still out-of-touch.  He's not ready to acknowledge that Iraq is a mess whether we stay or go, and probably a bigger mess if we stay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Exile that there&#8217;s a hint of progress here.   Last Fall, Kuhl was using anecdotes to support the notion that the war is going better than the media was reporting.  The &#8220;lobster&#8221; remark, and more importantly, the General Casey remark, both supported that position.  Now, Kuhl is using anecdotes to support a position that I think most people agree with:  Iraq will be a mess if we pull out.   So I think Kuhl&#8217;s assessment of Iraq is at least current with reality, which is a change from 6 months ago.  His conclusion that we need to stay to fix things is what&#8217;s still out-of-touch.  He&#8217;s not ready to acknowledge that Iraq is a mess whether we stay or go, and probably a bigger mess if we stay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27485</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27485</guid>
		<description>I think it's bogus but it's inbumbent on us to track it down and explain why we disagree.  Framing is not enough when it comes to Iraq.  The public is already on our side anyway.      

I don't think the Deputy Whip stuff means anything -- he's voted with the Democrats more than 75% of Republicans so far this term.  

I agree with you about the poison tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s bogus but it&#8217;s inbumbent on us to track it down and explain why we disagree.  Framing is not enough when it comes to Iraq.  The public is already on our side anyway.      </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the Deputy Whip stuff means anything &#8212; he&#8217;s voted with the Democrats more than 75% of Republicans so far this term.  </p>
<p>I agree with you about the poison tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlo7</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27479</link>
		<dc:creator>stlo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 04:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27479</guid>
		<description>So let me get this straight.  Treat bogus claims with respect?

I agree with treating a person or individual with respect.  I try to and expect the same from others.  I agree with that but letting claims as you describe as bogus go without a challenge is not the way to go.

It insults the audience. 

Re changing Randy  Kuhl's mind.  He is the deputy whip of the House.  He is in charge (well as in charge as a Deputy Whip can be) of securing votes for his party.  Sort of hard to be independent of the party when you are gathering votes for the party.

The Republican rationale for the war is bogus so everything from those claims is like the fruit from the poisoned tree.  It is poison. 

Respect the Person, Challenge the claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So let me get this straight.  Treat bogus claims with respect?</p>
<p>I agree with treating a person or individual with respect.  I try to and expect the same from others.  I agree with that but letting claims as you describe as bogus go without a challenge is not the way to go.</p>
<p>It insults the audience. </p>
<p>Re changing Randy  Kuhl&#8217;s mind.  He is the deputy whip of the House.  He is in charge (well as in charge as a Deputy Whip can be) of securing votes for his party.  Sort of hard to be independent of the party when you are gathering votes for the party.</p>
<p>The Republican rationale for the war is bogus so everything from those claims is like the fruit from the poisoned tree.  It is poison. </p>
<p>Respect the Person, Challenge the claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27294</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27294</guid>
		<description>Yes, but I think in this case, we should think about changing Kuhl's mind more than anything else.  And I think that treating his claims -- which I think are bogus -- with a certain amount of respect is the best way to do this.

In other words, I think we've moved passed the throwing the dynamite into the war to stir up the fish phase and into the reeling in the fish phase of this operation.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, but I think in this case, we should think about changing Kuhl&#8217;s mind more than anything else.  And I think that treating his claims &#8212; which I think are bogus &#8212; with a certain amount of respect is the best way to do this.</p>
<p>In other words, I think we&#8217;ve moved passed the throwing the dynamite into the war to stir up the fish phase and into the reeling in the fish phase of this operation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlo7</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27289</link>
		<dc:creator>stlo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 23:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27289</guid>
		<description>"WhatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s tricky here is that Kuhl can always say he didnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t vote for the war."

Why is this tricky.  He didn't vote to Oh I don't know, deny, then give women the right to vote, for deny then grant civil rights for all Americans or for that matter or more to the point the Gulf of Tonkin resolution yet he is part of an institution that did so. He is also part of an institution that has corrected course over time

What matters is correcting the course we are on now.  As constituents we expect him to do the wishes of the 29th.  60% of the American population want the war to end.  I'm assuming that this trend is roughly right in the 29th.  I'm under the impression that that a very large chuck of voters (I have to look it up but close to 50% I think) live in MC.  

So no sense in prolonging the war.

I'm pretty passionate here.  Why?  Reasonable discussion is a good thing but buying into anything that prolongs the inevitable is frankly a waste.  

Reasonable discussion does not mean benefit of the doubt.  We've done the benefit of the doubt thing.  And how has that worked out for us anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;WhatÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s tricky here is that Kuhl can always say he didnÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢t vote for the war.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why is this tricky.  He didn&#8217;t vote to Oh I don&#8217;t know, deny, then give women the right to vote, for deny then grant civil rights for all Americans or for that matter or more to the point the Gulf of Tonkin resolution yet he is part of an institution that did so. He is also part of an institution that has corrected course over time</p>
<p>What matters is correcting the course we are on now.  As constituents we expect him to do the wishes of the 29th.  60% of the American population want the war to end.  I&#8217;m assuming that this trend is roughly right in the 29th.  I&#8217;m under the impression that that a very large chuck of voters (I have to look it up but close to 50% I think) live in MC.  </p>
<p>So no sense in prolonging the war.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty passionate here.  Why?  Reasonable discussion is a good thing but buying into anything that prolongs the inevitable is frankly a waste.  </p>
<p>Reasonable discussion does not mean benefit of the doubt.  We&#8217;ve done the benefit of the doubt thing.  And how has that worked out for us anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Exile on Ericsson St.</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27260</link>
		<dc:creator>Exile on Ericsson St.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 21:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27260</guid>
		<description>The article I link to also quotes Paul Pillar as saying that Iran has benefited the most from the invasion.

What's tricky here is that Kuhl can always say he didn't vote for the war.  And he can pretend to be a sane multilateralist.  

What's screwed up is that he supported escalation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article I link to also quotes Paul Pillar as saying that Iran has benefited the most from the invasion.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s tricky here is that Kuhl can always say he didn&#8217;t vote for the war.  And he can pretend to be a sane multilateralist.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s screwed up is that he supported escalation&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stlo7</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27223</link>
		<dc:creator>stlo7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2007/03/17/because-i-am-that-kind-of-person/#comment-27223</guid>
		<description>Look,  Of course the Sunni neighbors Iraq are worried. The Sunnis in Iraq were a minority ruling class.  Who better to protect the minority than a proxy US Military.

So Saudi Arabia is &lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;funding or appears to be funding Sunni Insurgents&lt;/a&gt;. I'm sure it is for self-defense.  The type of funding that allows Sunnis to kill only Shia.  Oh, wait, where are the majority of US causalities?  In Sunni areas.

Next thing you know we will be saying Iran is responsible.  Oops.

We invaded Iraq to stop Saddam from nuking us.  If it was about liberating Shiites them we would have backed them in 1991 and not allowed Saddam to crush their uprising.  

We made a huge mess in Iraq and frankly our presence everyday is making it worse.   We are adding additional troops, speaking with neighbors and all that but we are the problem.  America troop presence is the issue.  Time to go.  

Read &lt;a href="http://www.juancole.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Juan Cole's blog&lt;/a&gt; for the ins and outs of inside Iraqi Politics.  The situation isn't pretty but he knows what he is talking about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look,  Of course the Sunni neighbors Iraq are worried. The Sunnis in Iraq were a minority ruling class.  Who better to protect the minority than a proxy US Military.</p>
<p>So Saudi Arabia is <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2006-12-08-saudis-sunnis_x.htm" rel="nofollow">funding or appears to be funding Sunni Insurgents</a>. I&#8217;m sure it is for self-defense.  The type of funding that allows Sunnis to kill only Shia.  Oh, wait, where are the majority of US causalities?  In Sunni areas.</p>
<p>Next thing you know we will be saying Iran is responsible.  Oops.</p>
<p>We invaded Iraq to stop Saddam from nuking us.  If it was about liberating Shiites them we would have backed them in 1991 and not allowed Saddam to crush their uprising.  </p>
<p>We made a huge mess in Iraq and frankly our presence everyday is making it worse.   We are adding additional troops, speaking with neighbors and all that but we are the problem.  America troop presence is the issue.  Time to go.  </p>
<p>Read <a href="http://www.juancole.com/" rel="nofollow">Juan Cole&#8217;s blog</a> for the ins and outs of inside Iraqi Politics.  The situation isn&#8217;t pretty but he knows what he is talking about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.556 seconds -->
