BREAKING NEWS: Kuhl caves in to White House, votes “no” on anti-escalation resolution

Kuhl voted with the Republicans against the anti-escalation measure. (The page is loading slowly, the vote was 246-182 in favor. That’s 17 Republican defections total, two Democratic defections, and 6 not voting.)

Looks like we’ve got a race on our hands in the 29th in 2008!

For those keeping tabs on the dirty half-dozen, we had: 5 “nays” (Fossella, McHugh, King, Reynolds, Kuhl) and one “yea” (Walsh).

I’m surprised. The last time I saw something like this was Jonestown, Guyana.

RSS feed | Trackback URI

6 Comments »

Comment by Mark J B
2007-02-16 16:19:07

It seems as though the only one that can see the forest through the trees is Walsh. The best thing I can say about this is that it is most certainyl on now! Mr. Massa, we need your spirit, expertise, and ability to defuse the ticking bomb that is Robo Randy

 
Comment by DragonFlyEye
2007-02-16 16:24:45

Love the Jonestown reference. Creepy but appropos. Looks like you beat me to the punch by about fifteen minutes in posting this article. Amazing how closely the anti-Kuhl (as opposed to antifreeze) coalition is watching this vote, eh?

Comment by bythepeople
2007-02-16 16:34:13

Dude, I feel the same way when I’m all ready to post and he scoops ME.

 
 
Comment by Thomas
2007-02-17 11:32:37

I’m 1 for 3 when it comes to judging local Republican Rep. support for the resolution. I predicted Walsh and Reynolds would vote against, and Kuhl would vote for it. Walsh has more political sense than I thought. Kuhl and Reynolds must be banking on the fact that November 2008 is 18 months away unless they’re politically clueless.

2007-02-17 11:38:37

I only knew how Walsh would vote because I read his statements last week.

Kuhl surprised me. I can tell you this: it certainly gives a lot of life to a second Massa challenge. This is plain stupid politics.

Comment by stlo7
2007-02-17 12:18:45

I wasn’t surprised by Kuhl’s vote nor Reynolds. Walsh actually surprised me (I didn’t read his comments)

Randy Kuhl has repeatedly and blindly committed himself to the failed policies of this administration. What would you expect when it came to a vote?

 
 
 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.

Election Day Countdown

All content on this site © 2006-2008 RochesterTurning.com, All Rights Reserved.
Read about Joe Bruno's shady campaign cash.