<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saddam is dead - are we there yet?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2006/12/30/saddam-is-dead-are-we-there-yet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2006/12/30/saddam-is-dead-are-we-there-yet/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2006/12/30/saddam-is-dead-are-we-there-yet/#comment-5904</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 03:01:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2006/12/30/saddam-is-dead-are-we-there-yet/#comment-5904</guid>
		<description>I've always said that the US was going to follow cowboy movie school of jurisprudence regarding Saddam, as in "We're gonna give him a fair trial an' then hang him." I never expected our cowboy diplomats to take the notion so literally.

The truly sad thing is that Bush even fucked taking out Saddam. We've squandered years and millions of dollars on a shabby show trial that just turned Saddam into a martyr. We could have gotten better results 3 years ago if we were willing to kill Saddam outright. Just dropping a grenade into his spider hole would have been "cleanest" in terms of strategy, but even arranging a quiet assassination (where Saddam died "trying to escape" or "resisting arrest") would have been palatable.

While the whole Iraq invasion was a strategic disaster, killing Saddam in 2003 could have possibly slowed the insurgency, to the extent that it discouraged the "bitter end" Baathists from fighting or funding other insurgents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always said that the US was going to follow cowboy movie school of jurisprudence regarding Saddam, as in &#8220;We&#8217;re gonna give him a fair trial an&#8217; then hang him.&#8221; I never expected our cowboy diplomats to take the notion so literally.</p>
<p>The truly sad thing is that Bush even fucked taking out Saddam. We&#8217;ve squandered years and millions of dollars on a shabby show trial that just turned Saddam into a martyr. We could have gotten better results 3 years ago if we were willing to kill Saddam outright. Just dropping a grenade into his spider hole would have been &#8220;cleanest&#8221; in terms of strategy, but even arranging a quiet assassination (where Saddam died &#8220;trying to escape&#8221; or &#8220;resisting arrest&#8221;) would have been palatable.</p>
<p>While the whole Iraq invasion was a strategic disaster, killing Saddam in 2003 could have possibly slowed the insurgency, to the extent that it discouraged the &#8220;bitter end&#8221; Baathists from fighting or funding other insurgents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
