<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WXXI Hearts Robach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/</link>
	<description>turning the tide upstate</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 07:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wpowell</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/#comment-1734</link>
		<dc:creator>wpowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 18:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/#comment-1734</guid>
		<description>I didn't hear the news spot, so I called WXXI to ask if they would &lt;a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wxxi/news.newsmain?action=section&#38;SECTION_ID=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt; the track as a podcast&lt;/a&gt;, which they did.  

I'm not sure I can objectively critique it - better that you decide whether delabarre's reaction is valid.  I am a little miffed at the way Major Duffy was boxed into a quasi-endorsement.

Bud also summarized my whole &lt;a href="http://www.votewilla.com/senate2006/index.php?module=pagemaster&#38;PAGE_user_op=view_page&#38;PAGE_id=5&#38;MMN_position=9:9" rel="nofollow"&gt;platform&lt;/a&gt; into a single sentence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hear the news spot, so I called WXXI to ask if they would <a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wxxi/news.newsmain?action=section&amp;SECTION_ID=1" rel="nofollow">post</a> the track as a podcast, which they did.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure I can objectively critique it - better that you decide whether delabarre&#8217;s reaction is valid.  I am a little miffed at the way Major Duffy was boxed into a quasi-endorsement.</p>
<p>Bud also summarized my whole <a href="http://www.votewilla.com/senate2006/index.php?module=pagemaster&amp;PAGE_user_op=view_page&amp;PAGE_id=5&amp;MMN_position=9:9" rel="nofollow">platform</a> into a single sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wpowell</title>
		<link>http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/#comment-1732</link>
		<dc:creator>wpowell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 17:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rochesterturning.com/2006/10/24/wxxi-hearts-robach/#comment-1732</guid>
		<description>I hadn't heard the news peice, so I followed up on delabarre's post.  I called WXXI, and convinced Bud Lowell to make the peice available on &lt;a href="http://stream.publicbroadcasting.net/production/mp3/wxxi/local-wxxi-537382.mp3" rel="nofollow"&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wxxi/news.newsmain?action=article&#38;ARTICLE_ID=986194&#38;sectionID=1" rel="nofollow"&gt;local news section&lt;/a&gt;

I guess I'm partly to blame for the content, or lack thereof.  I didn't tout what I would do, when Bud Lowell cornered me at the Albany Express press conference hosted by AQE and Citizen Action.   I didn't give him any great sound bites to work with.  Bud insists he did a fair job, and that he summarized my platform directly from my website.  He managed to do it in a single sentence, whereas I have a whole &lt;a href="http://www.votewilla.com/senate2006/index.php?module=pagemaster&#38;PAGE_user_op=view_page&#38;PAGE_id=5&#38;MMN_position=9:9" rel="nofollow"&gt;web page&lt;/a&gt; that translates a single spaced, small font printed page (wait until you see the insert in City Newspaper this week!).  I break my platform into three distinct peices, so if I had my d'ruthers, I would have liked my platform described that way.

The bottom line is that the media covers political contests like horse races, not like reasoned debates.  Why should WXXI be any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard the news peice, so I followed up on delabarre&#8217;s post.  I called WXXI, and convinced Bud Lowell to make the peice available on <a href="http://stream.publicbroadcasting.net/production/mp3/wxxi/local-wxxi-537382.mp3" rel="nofollow">podcast</a> from the <a href="http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wxxi/news.newsmain?action=article&amp;ARTICLE_ID=986194&amp;sectionID=1" rel="nofollow">local news section</a></p>
<p>I guess I&#8217;m partly to blame for the content, or lack thereof.  I didn&#8217;t tout what I would do, when Bud Lowell cornered me at the Albany Express press conference hosted by AQE and Citizen Action.   I didn&#8217;t give him any great sound bites to work with.  Bud insists he did a fair job, and that he summarized my platform directly from my website.  He managed to do it in a single sentence, whereas I have a whole <a href="http://www.votewilla.com/senate2006/index.php?module=pagemaster&amp;PAGE_user_op=view_page&amp;PAGE_id=5&amp;MMN_position=9:9" rel="nofollow">web page</a> that translates a single spaced, small font printed page (wait until you see the insert in City Newspaper this week!).  I break my platform into three distinct peices, so if I had my d&#8217;ruthers, I would have liked my platform described that way.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the media covers political contests like horse races, not like reasoned debates.  Why should WXXI be any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
